Skip to main content

Tome of Clarification

Hello!  Welcome to Indistinguishable from Magic, in which I will examine the real-world utility of spells from Dungeons & Dragons. 

Before we get started, here's the house rules:

- I'm using only the spells used in the Player's Handbook, 5th edition, but I will discuss all the spells listed there.

- The assumption is that our theoretical magic-user has the ability to cast any spell, but that they have no other extraordinary powers. 

- Further assume that normal people they encounter in 'the real world' -- defined generally as 21st-century America in our present reality -- have the typical NPC stat blocks provided in the Monster Manual. So an average person would have 5 or 6 hit points, an Armor Class of 18-20, and statistics averaging between 10 and 12.

- Crucially, it is assumed that no one in 'the real world' has the abilities that our magic-user has, and more importantly, that magic as is understood in a D&D context does not exist. Our magic-user can access, but no one else can!

- All that said, we'll cross certain bridges about what the 'real world' and the D&D world actually are and how our magic-user's spells work as we go along. 

So let's get going!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

B/1

Bane Insert joke here about Tom Hardy's weird voice work here! Actually, for the low low price of one single drop of blood, this spell makes an enemy of your choice bad at things for up to a minute. The perfect example of an effective buff spell:  simple, basic, tilts the odds just enough in your favor. As good in the real world as in D&D. Real-World Rating  7 (Effective) Banishing Smite Another of those high-level spells that is more flash than function. It can inflict a fuck-ton of damage (up to 50 HP in addition to whatever you normally do with a weapon), but the real heat is if that takes your target to under 50 HP -- which it surely will to all but the most powerful foes -- you banish them to another plane of existence! Spectacular, cool, but...why bother? Why not just kill them, thus totally eliminating the possibility this dangerous enemy will return and be super pissed at you? There's no insult-to-injury scale in the real world, so this just seems like murder ...

D/4

Dominate Beast Whether or not this is a good spell depends on what you're trying to get out of it. If the idea is to befriend an animal, this one is a good shortcut to spending several months training it, although, really, what are you going to do with a trained animal beyond being friends with it? You came to a world without magic to win , not to make friends! With a bear! If the idea is to neutralize an animal that might otherwise be a threat, though, just shoot it*. Real-World Rating:  5 (Effective But Limited) Dominate Monster Ain't no monsters. Ain't nothin' to dominate. Real-World Rating :  1 (Worthless) Dominate Person As a front-door mind control spell, this isn't bad; as a back-door mind control spell, it's even better. This does the same basic thing the other Dominate spell, but there's a way to short-circuit your target into total meat-puppet mode. It doesn't last very long, and there's a Save vs. Wisdom, but there's never a bad way to...

B/2

Blade Ward Like a lot of D&D spells, this one is more impressive in a medieval-fantasy milieu than it is in the real world. Unlike previous iterations of the spell, it doesn't make you immune to conventional melee weapon damage; it just gives you advantage. That's not bad, though, and since it's a cantrip in 5th edition, you can just use it over and over again. In the real world, of course, someone would just shoot you*, and you can't use it to, say, protect a crowd against police beatings, because it only works on the caster. Still and all, 'being largely immune to beatings and stabbings' is a good thing to have in your pocket, depending on the circles you travel in. Real-World Rating  5 (Effective But Limited) Blinding Smite We've talked before about the usefulness of these 'tons of damage plus '-type spells, and most of them, including this one, are generally in the why-bother category, especially given that here, the blindness is not permanen...